Many Christian pacifists cite the words of Jesus to argue He would never condone any kind of deadly force (in spite of the obvious justifications for killing allowed by the Old Testament Law). They typically cite the following passage (from the Sermon on the Mount) to make their case:
“But I tell you who hear me: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. If someone strikes you on one cheek, turn to him the other also. If someone takes your cloak, do not stop him from taking your tunic. Give to everyone who asks you, and if anyone takes what belongs to you, do not demand it back. Do to others as you would have them do to you.”
What did Jesus mean here when He said, “If someone strikes you on one cheek, turn to him the other also”? Was Jesus advocating pacifism? If we consider this passage in the context of Jesus’ life, other teachings in the gospels, and the immediate context of the Sermon on the Mount, it’s difficult to interpret it as an effort to advocate pacifism. When Jesus told His followers to “turn the other cheek,” He was referring to personal retaliation rather than to responses related to criminal offenses or actions related to military force. Jesus was not contradicting God’s Old Testament laws regarding the use of deadly force, but was, instead, encouraging His followers to resist the desire to react personally when their dignity or pride had been insulted. He also told his followers to resist lawsuits related to personal finances (Luke 6:40), personal liberty (6:41) and personal property (6:42). This passage involves personal rights and not was not a dictate related to the use of deadly force. While this passage in isolation has been used to make a case for pacifism, it must be read in the context of all Jesus’ actions and teachings. The life of Jesus helps us to understand what Jesus taught and believed about the use of deadly force:
Jesus Believed Some Causes Call for Aggressive Action
Jesus was quick to act aggressively to defend what He believed was right:
When it was almost time for the Jewish Passover, Jesus went up to Jerusalem. In the temple courts he found men selling cattle, sheep and doves, and others sitting at tables exchanging money. So he made a whip out of cords, and drove all from the temple area, both sheep and cattle; he scattered the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables. To those who sold doves he said, “Get these out of here! How dare you turn my Father’s house into a market!”
Jesus Called for the Use of the Sword
In Biblical times, the only “sidearms” available to people to use for protection were knives or swords. Today’s equivalent weapons would be pistols and automatic rifles. Jesus told his disciples to arm themselves with swords:
He said to them, “But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.”
Why would Jesus say this? At the very least, Jesus was calling His disciples to prepare themselves for their own defense. And the sword (a killing instrument) was evidently permissible in the eyes of Jesus.
Jesus Never Condemned the Life, Calling or Duty of Those Who Exercised Deadly Force
Jesus’ beliefs related to the appropriate use of force gave Him a proper perspective on the role of soldiers who regularly used deadly force. Maybe that’s why Jesus never commented negatively on soldiers with whom he came in contact:
When Jesus had entered Capernaum, a centurion came to him, asking for help. “Lord,” he said, “my servant lies at home paralyzed and in terrible suffering.” Jesus said to him, “I will go and heal him.” The centurion replied, “Lord, I do not deserve to have you come under my roof. But just say the word, and my servant will be healed. For I myself am a man under authority, with soldiers under me. I tell this one, ‘Go,’ and he goes; and that one, ‘Come,’ and he comes. I say to my servant, ‘Do this,’ and he does it.” When Jesus heard this, he was astonished and said to those following him, “I tell you the truth, I have not found anyone in Israel with such great faith. I say to you that many will come from the east and the west, and will take their places at the feast with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven. But the subjects of the kingdom will be thrown outside, into the darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.”
Jesus praised the faith of the soldier without making a negative statement about his work or life as a warrior. This is similar to the approach John the Baptist took with soldiers who came to be baptized:
Tax collectors also came to be baptized. “Teacher,” they asked, “what should we do?” “Don’t collect any more than you are required to,” he told them. Then some soldiers asked him, “And what should we do?” He replied, “Don’t extort money and don’t accuse people falsely-be content with your pay.”
John also failed to scold the soldiers for the work they were doing. Like Jesus, he didn’t tell these soldiers they should disarm and become pacifists.
Jesus Agreed with the Father’s Perspective on War
God occasionally commanded the Israelites to engage in war in the Old Testament (carefully limiting these commands to the justifications He provided for the use of deadly force). The Bible declares the nature of God to be unchanging:
“I the LORD do not change”
Every good and perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of the heavenly lights, who does not change like shifting shadows.
Given the unchanging nature of God and His declarations related to the use of deadly force, consider the following passages:
“I and the Father are one.”
Jesus answered: “Don’t you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? Don’t you believe that I am in the Father, and that the Father is in me? The words I say to you are not just my own. Rather, it is the Father, living in me, who is doing his work.”
“These words you hear are not my own; they belong to the Father who sent me.”
1 John 5:6-7
This is the one who came by water and blood-Jesus Christ. He did not come by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit who testifies, because the Spirit is the truth. For there are three that testify: the Spirit, the water and the blood; and the three are in agreement.
Jesus and God the Father are in perfect agreement about everything. So whatever God says about the use of deadly force in the Old Testament is still true about the use of deadly force in the New Testament. Jesus agrees with God the father because Jesus is a member of the triune Godhead.
Jesus is Himself a Warrior
With this in mind, it’s much easier to understand and accept the way Jesus is depicted in the Book of Revelation, where He is described as a warrior at the End Times:
I saw heaven standing open and there before me was a white horse, whose rider is called Faithful and True. With justice he judges and makes war. His eyes are like blazing fire, and on his head are many crowns. He has a name written on him that no one knows but he himself. He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God. The armies of heaven were following him, riding on white horses and dressed in fine linen, white and clean. Out of his mouth comes a sharp sword with which to strike down the nations. “He will rule them with an iron scepter.” He treads the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God Almighty. On his robe and on his thigh he has this name written: KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS. And I saw an angel standing in the sun, who cried in a loud voice to all the birds flying in midair, “Come, gather together for the great supper of God, so that you may eat the flesh of kings, generals, and mighty men, of horses and their riders, and the flesh of all people, free and slave, small and great.” Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to make war against the rider on the horse and his army. But the beast was captured, and with him the false prophet who had performed the miraculous signs on his behalf. With these signs he had deluded those who had received the mark of the beast and worshiped his image. The two of them were thrown alive into the fiery lake of burning sulfur. The rest of them were killed with the sword that came out of the mouth of the rider on the horse, and all the birds gorged themselves on their flesh.
So, is Jesus the pacifist some would like us to accept? If we, as Christians, are to model our lives after the life of Christ and be imitators of Jesus (Ephesians 5:1), then we will also find ourselves embracing the view of war Jesus clearly reflected in Jesus’ life and actions. While it is true Jesus never resisted those who would eventually nail Him to the cross, this effort on the part of Jesus was a unique and specific act of submission designed to accomplish the Salvation all of us so desperately need. Jesus’ final act of obedience did not contradict his prior actions and teachings related to the use of deadly force. Jesus was not a pacifist, even though He chose to passively submit His life to save those who trust in Him.
For more information about the reliability of the New Testament gospels and the case for Christianity, please read Cold-Case Christianity: A Homicide Detective Investigates the Claims of the Gospels. This book teaches readers ten principles of cold-case investigations and applies these strategies to investigate the claims of the gospel authors. The book is accompanied by an eight-session Cold-Case Christianity DVD Set (and Participant’s Guide) to help individuals or small groups examine the evidence and make the case.
October 6, 2020 at 10:10 am
Jesus as the incarnate GOD lived as a representative of man who represented perfectly what a perfect man was to do and say in “kingdom life”… and he lived IN THE FLESH as a pacifists. God has always used pagan men to conquer and punish and the use of force can be RIGHT but not CHRISTIAN. It is JUST but Jesus taught to do MORE than just obey the justice of the law. We are to extend GRACE and MERCY and leave any JUSTICE ENACTING to GOD… Even the passage often quoted about swords do indicate that he intended to use them. In fact we are told the reason for that command, “so that he would be numbered WITH THE TRANSGRESSORS” since it was against the law to fight a roman or Roman appointed guard. Even the carrying of a sword can be a deterrent as we are told to be wise as a serpent YET HARMLESS as doves. So the presence of a sword will deter evil even if we would never use it to kill someone. I can shoot at the floor to make a thief run away and be a practical pacifist.
When he returns in Rev he will not be our Example, he will be our KING and that is the reason for the difference in not condemning others in his humanity, but condemning ALL evil as the GOD-KING.
October 6, 2020 at 10:12 am
OOPS.. quoted about swords do indicate that
meant to say.. quoted about swords do NOT indicate…
Pingback: Weekly Bonus Links 10/4-10/10 | Apologetics315
Laura L Vest
October 11, 2020 at 3:38 pm
And remember Luke 12:51, and folks from. NC would say, “oooh, that’s a good-un!”
Love your books, articles and videos! I’m grateful the Lord made you brilliant and a snappy dresser! ;>)
October 13, 2020 at 1:34 am
Dear Mr. Wallace,
thank you for your article, I enjoyed reading through it. But I have one question: At the beginning, you refer to the Old Testament Law which allows killing in certain situations. I thought about Jesus’ teaching on divorce in Matthew 19,8 where he states that divorce is permitted by the Old Testament Law because of the hartness of their hearts. How do we know that the situation with the permission of killing isn’t similiar, that it permitted because of our human weaknesses?
October 18, 2020 at 12:33 pm
Thank you for writing this thought-inducing article. I wanted to mention that I own a gun, but I don’t own bullets- as I am quite aware that my kids are smart enough to find my gun-safe keys when I am out; and since firearms are the second leading cause of death among U.S. children and adolescents, after car crashes- I will not needlessly risk their lives. (About 1000 kids / year are killed in the US by ‘playing around with guns’.) I have the gun in case a burglar or home-invader shows up- to scare them off and prevent a violent situation. Jesus, being far more intelligent/wise than me- had likely used the same reasoning when recommending the purchase of a sword.
I also wanted to mention that the use of absolutism and labels that convey extreme levels of adherence or belief (100% of course being the most extreme) is a telltale sign of unnuanced thinking which we might use in shorthand from time to time, but could otherwise be avoided. Why would we want to do that? In therapeutic studies it has been shown to promote emotional distress, particularly anger, when people are confronted by situations which do not conform to their demands concerning what ought to happen. [source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10397428/ ]
To engage the world in “ists” and “isms” is useful when we wish to paint with broad strokes. When I say I’m a pacifist, a good friend of mine constructed an extreme situation where I am a time-traveler who could only avoid the cruel deaths of 6 million people only by killing Hitler, asking what I would do. I conceded their point. “Well apparently you aren’t a *real* pacifist” they say. I then asked them if they have ever had a doubt about a biblical statement, including the Protestant Apocrypha (which oddly are considered Canon by Catholics as well as many Christians.) He angrily said “Of course! The Apocrypha are.. oh.. I see what you are getting at..”
I haven’t yet read it, but I noticed that _Jesus the Pacifist: A Concise Guide to His Radical Nonviolence_ has 5/5 stars on Amazon. Other noted pacifists such as MLK Jr were unafraid to take that label on themselves, and we could (if we chose) do the same.
Paula M Brown
November 11, 2020 at 6:10 am
Dear Mr. Warner,
Thank you for attempt to justify war and killing, but you are wrong! The verses you use from the mouth of Jesus are all taken out of context. The sermon on the mount is has simplicity and clarity. We are not to defend ourselves or go to war. When Jesus says to get a sword, he is saying this to fulfill prophesy and he states this in the same sentence.
He said to them, “But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one. It is written: ‘And he was numbered with the transgressors’; and I tell you that this must be fulfilled in me. Yes, what is written about me is reaching its fulfillment.” The disciples said, “See, Lord, here are two swords.” “That’s enough!” he replied.
— Gospel of Luke 22:36-38
All the blood in Revelations is the blood of the saints, and the saints that are martyred for righteousness sake are held in high esteem in the kingdom. Paula was beaten, whipped, jailed, and tortured, but he never fought back with violence. He fought with spiritual weapons, singing, praying, loving, and willing to lay down his life for a brother. That is the greatest love of all per Jesus. Jesus and Steven publically asked the Father to forgive their enemies for the torturing and killing them. Many if not all the disciples were martyred.
Just think if all of Christ’s followers truly followed and emulated Him, what a different world this would be. Jesus brought a New Covenant, a more glorious covenant based on a promise and power of God.
I own weapons and hold a ccw, but I have changed my view on this because Jesus teaches 100% non-violence. I am laying down my weapons and focusing on my true home with Him in Heaven and the new world to come.
November 11, 2020 at 7:04 am
We will have to agree to disagree on this one. My family would have been unable to provide a critical service as police officers if we thought God would not allow the use of force to stop evil. Deadly force is justified ion the Old Testament, but it is rightly limited: https://coldcasechristianity.com/writings/whats-the-christian-position-related-to-the-use-of-deadly-force/
December 27, 2020 at 9:59 am
Thank you for this article and the last one on whether Christianity requires pacifism. I think it would be helpful if you would take this a step further to help us who are struggling with what to do regarding an evil government which is promoting killing babies and bodily / chemical mutilation of children rather than helping them understand how to live with the gender they were born with. Personally, I’m for the succession of states as a first step to show there will be civil war if people persist in pushing these evils.
January 9, 2021 at 2:10 pm
Check out the book Jesus the Pacifist by Fleischer. It makes a very strong case that Jesus was indeed a pacifist. The chapters on Revelation are particularly good.
August 20, 2022 at 2:11 pm
#amen #godisgood #jesussaves #backtheblue #backthebadge 💙✝️💙